This year more than usually, if you want straight talking about the state of the economy and its prospects, listen to the econocrats not the election-crazed politicians.
Late last week, Reserve Bank governor Dr Philip Lowe had more sensible things to say in three hours than we usually get in a month.
He was giving evidence to the House of Representatives standing committee on economics. For a start, he left little doubt about his disapproval of the way the two sides are turning the election campaign into a bidding war.
It’s clear the reason the election is being delayed until May is so Scott Morrison can use the April 2 budget to announce tax cuts in addition to the three-stage, $144 billion-over-10-years cuts he announced in last year’s budget.
He’s upping the ante not just because he’s behind in the polls, but also because Bill Shorten is promising to make the first-stage cuts about twice the size of Morrison’s. And big increases in spending on health and education.
Plus Shorten is claiming he’d have bigger budget surpluses. How? By reducing tax breaks used mainly by higher income-earners. The risk, however, is that Labor could get locked into cutting taxes and increasing spending, but not be able to get its revenue-raising measures through the Senate.
What would be worrying Lowe is that, just as we’ve come within sight of returning the budget to (tiny) surplus – but before we’ve made any progress in repaying the huge debt successive governments have racked up over the past decade – both sides have declared Mission Accomplished and started promising tax cuts galore.
Lowe said we should be running big budget surpluses and cutting back the debt as a sort of insurance policy against the next downturn in the economy – which he doesn’t see happening in the next year or two, but will happen one day.
Consider this. When the global financial crisis hit in October 2008, Lowe’s predecessor acted to protect us from the tsunami by cutting the official interest rate by 4 percentage points in about as many months.
Trouble is, we’ve since entered a low growth, low inflation world, and interest rates have remained low. The official interest rate is just 1.5 per cent. So the central bank has little scope to stimulate the economy the way it did last time.
In that case, the government should use its budget to stimulate the economy by splashing cash, spending on school playgrounds and the like.
See the problem? We won’t have much scope to do that, either, if we’ve been so busy awarding ourselves tax cuts that we’ve made little progress in reducing all the debt we’ll be starting with.
Moving on, Lowe said the economy’s two main worries were the weak growth in wages and falling house prices. But he stressed that wages and household income were far more significant than house prices.
If you were thinking it was the other way round, that may be because the media have misled you. “It’s largely the income story which doesn’t get talked about enough, because the media love talking about property prices,” he said.
Whereas household income, coming mainly from wages, used to grow by about 6 per cent a year (before allowing for inflation), in recent years it’s grown by less than 3 per cent.
Lowe didn’t say it, but what economists see as weak growth in wages, most ordinary mortals perceive as the worsening “cost of living” – which polling shows is now voters’ greatest concern.
People are having trouble balancing their own budgets, not because prices generally are soaring, but because their wages aren’t growing a per cent or two faster than prices, the way they used to.
Lowe is confident wages will gradually improve, but “if we have another five years where workers don’t get their normal share of productivity growth [that is, if wages don’t return to growing a per cent or so faster than prices each year], we’ll have all sorts of economic, social and political problems”.
Gosh. He did have some good news, however. He’s confident employment will continue growing strongly because the rate of job vacancies is higher than it’s ever been.
And whereas economists have long believed the rate of unemployment couldn’t fall below “about 5 per cent” before we started getting excessive wage settlements and rising inflation, Lowe now believes unemployment can fall further to “about 4.5 per cent” before there’s a problem. (May not sound much to you, but it gives us scope for 67,000 more jobs.)
Lowe says there’s more competition between the big banks than we’re told about. Remember a few months ago when they raised their mortgage interest rates by between 0.1 and 0.15 percentage points?
That’s what they told the media and what they wrote on their price lists. In truth, however, rates rose by only 0.03 or 0.04 points. Why? Because too many of their customers threatened to take their business elsewhere.
Finally, some free advice from the nation’s most powerful economist: “I encourage everyone who has a mortgage, if they haven’t done so recently, to go and ask their bank for a better deal. And if the bank says no, go look for another bank.”
